| 49 | | PyOSG has hand-crafted wrappers for the OSG classes. This is very |
|---|
| 50 | | work-intensive, but has the advantage that a lot of cool stuff can be |
|---|
| 51 | | done in the wrappers. Like allowing to subclass from NodeVisitors and |
|---|
| 52 | | even Drawable in python. (Not so sure about that last one but from the |
|---|
| 53 | | looks of it it could work.) |
|---|
| 54 | | |
|---|
| 55 | | * [http://mescriva.codemaniacs.com/svn/osgPython/trunk osgPython], by |
|---|
| 56 | | Miguel Escriva et al., relies on the new |
|---|
| 57 | | osgIntrospection/osgWrappers. According to |
|---|
| 58 | | [http://openscenegraph.org/archiver/osg-users/2007-April/0399.html |
|---|
| 59 | | Ulrich Hertlein], this makes it more up-to-date with less work. But he |
|---|
| 60 | | found that it's not possible to sub-class from NodeVisitor, so that |
|---|
| 61 | | method didn't work so well for him. Also they took a long(-ish) time |
|---|
| | 49 | PyOSG has hand-crafted wrappers for the OSG classes. This is very work-intensive, but has the advantage that a lot of cool stuff can be done in the wrappers. Like allowing to subclass from NodeVisitors in Python. |
|---|
| | 50 | * [http://mescriva.codemaniacs.com/svn/osgPython/trunk osgPython], by Miguel Escriva et al., relies on the new |
|---|
| | 51 | osgIntrospection/osgWrappers. According to [http://openscenegraph.org/archiver/osg-users/2007-April/0399.html |
|---|
| | 52 | Ulrich Hertlein], this makes it more up-to-date with less work. But he found that it's not possible to sub-class from NodeVisitor, so that method didn't work so well for him. Also they took a long(-ish) time |
|---|